Introduction
In the fast-evolving realm of artificial intelligence (AI), both Nvidia and Intel are central players offering critical hardware infrastructure. Nvidia’s CUDA platform has long stood as a cornerstone for AI developers, providing a robust foundation for AI endeavors. However, this dominance poses a challenge for competitors like Intel and AMD who aim to drive the adoption of their own AI hardware solutions. A significant portion of AI code is intricately tied to Nvidia’s CUDA runtime, necessitating a thorough overhaul to ensure compatibility with alternative platforms. This challenge underscores the importance of adapting and refining code to seamlessly operate across a diverse array of AI hardware.
Follow us on Linkedin for everything around Semiconductors & AI
How CUDA is a game changer for Nvidia
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture) is a parallel computing platform and programming model developed by Nvidia for its GPUs. It allows developers to access the full power of Nvidia GPUs by writing code in C, C++, or Python and using a set of extensions to the programming languages.
CUDA has become the de facto standard for programming GPUs for machine learning, artificial intelligence, and other high-performance computing applications. This is because CUDA provides a number of advantages over other programming models, including:
- High performance: CUDA code can be significantly faster than code written for CPUs or other parallel computing platforms.
- Ease of use: CUDA is relatively easy to learn and use, especially for programmers who are already familiar with C, C++, or Python.
- Portability: CUDA code can be ported to different Nvidia GPUs with minimal changes.
Read more: Understanding Parallel Processing: A Tale of Nvidia vs Intel
Only for Nvidia
However, CUDA is also a closed-source platform, which means that only Nvidia can develop and distribute CUDA compilers, libraries, and tools. This has led to some concerns that Nvidia could use its control over CUDA to create a monopoly in the GPU computing market.
There are a few ways in which CUDA could lead to a monopoly:
- Vendor lock-in: Developers who write their code in CUDA are locked into using Nvidia GPUs. This is because CUDA code cannot be run on GPUs from other vendors.
- Higher prices: Nvidia could charge higher prices for its GPUs because developers have no other choice but to use them for CUDA-based applications.
- Reduced innovation: Nvidia could reduce innovation in the GPU computing market because it knows that developers are locked into its platform.
It is important to note that Nvidia is a dominant player in the GPU market, with a market share of over 80%. This gives Nvidia a significant advantage in the development of CUDA and other GPU software.
What is Intel CTO innovative Suggestion for Nvidia Monopoly
Intel’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Greg Lavender, has proposed a forward-thinking solution to address this challenge: utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) and technologies like Copilot to train a machine learning model capable of converting CUDA code to SYCL.
SYCL, a royalty-free, cross-architecture abstraction layer developed by Intel, powers Intel’s parallel C++ programming language. It acts as a bridge to enable CUDA code to run on non-Nvidia accelerators.
SYCL handles a significant portion of the code porting process, streamlining the transition from CUDA to a format compatible with various hardware architectures. However, fine-tuning and adjustments are often necessary to optimize performance for specific hardware platforms. Intel envisions automating this fine-tuning process further using LLMs, marking a significant leap toward a low-code or even a no-code paradigm for software development in the AI ecosystem.
Intel recognizes the main challenge is selecting suitable source data for training the LLM model. Besides SYCL, they highlight alternatives like OpenAI’s Triton and Google’s Jax, offering standard methods for writing hardware-neutral code. The industry is working collaboratively to democratize AI hardware programming by establishing standardized compilation chains for diverse hardware, minimizing dependency on specific vendors.
Intel is actively advancing AI through practical efforts, not just speculation. Their initiatives, like oneAPI and OpenVINO, showcase significant progress. The open-source oneAPI has seen an impressive 85% growth in installations since 2021. Intel is committed to the AI community, evident in their release of open source reference kits for various AI/ML workloads. This underscores their dedication to enhancing AI development across diverse platforms.
In summary, Intel’s method of converting legacy CUDA code is a crucial step in transforming AI hardware compatibility. They use emerging tech like LLMs and open-source frameworks to speed up the shift to hardware-neutral AI software. This benefits both developers and the wider industry. Intel’s approach reshapes the landscape of AI hardware compatibility and accessibility significantly. They strive to make AI programming independent of specific accelerators.
