Introduction
As semiconductor manufacturers race to develop the next-generation process nodes, Intel’s 18A and TSMC’s N2 are emerging as the most talked-about technologies in the industry.
Both are positioned in the 2nm-class node, which signifies a leap in transistor scaling. However, despite sharing similarities, these two nodes have distinct features that could shape the future of chip performance and efficiency.
techovedas.com/intel-signs-2-more-customers-for-18a-boosting-foundry-ambitions
Brief Overview
Intel’s 18A: Faster with a mid-2025 production timeline and higher performance.
TSMC’s N2: Denser with a later 2025 production schedule and higher transistor density.
Transistor Density: TSMC’s N2 leads with a 38 Mb/mm² SRAM density, while Intel’s 18A offers 31.8 Mb/mm².
Power Efficiency: TSMC’s N2 is expected to have better power efficiency, consistent with the company’s history.
Technology: Intel 18A incorporates RibbonFET and PowerVia, while TSMC N2 uses nanosheet GAA transistors.
Intel 18A: Pioneering High Performance
Intel’s 18A process node is projected to provide higher performance and greater transistor density compared to its predecessor, the Intel 3 node.
A major feature of this node is its RibbonFET architecture, paired with PowerVia—a backside power delivery network. These technologies are designed to enhance both performance and efficiency by improving power delivery and reducing signal degradation.
Intel’s 18A is expected to achieve a 15% improvement in performance per watt and a 30% increase in transistor density over the previous 3nm node.
Intel’s decision to incorporate PowerVia is particularly interesting. This innovation allows for more efficient power delivery by placing the power delivery network at the back of the chip,
unlike traditional power delivery systems, which are located at the front. This could lead to significant improvements in performance and density, positioning Intel’s 18A as a formidable contender in the next-generation chip market.
techovedas.com/tsmc-n3p-to-outperform-intel-18a-derailing-intels-foundry-leadership-plan-by-2025
TSMC N2: Focused on Density
In contrast, TSMC’s N2 process node is expected to prioritize transistor density, which could make it a better option for applications that require more compact designs.
The N2 node is built around nanosheet GAA (Gate-All-Around) transistors, which offer improved control over current flow, enabling higher performance and energy efficiency at smaller scales.
TSMC’s N2 is set to feature an SRAM density of 38 Mb/mm², higher than Intel’s 18A, which achieves 31.8 Mb/mm². This increased density allows for the integration of more transistors in a given area, making TSMC’s N2 particularly appealing for high-density applications like advanced mobile devices and AI accelerators. Additionally, TSMC’s N2 is expected to offer a 30% power efficiency improvement and a 15% performance boost compared to its 3nm predecessor.
Intel to Start Mass EUV Production in Ireland; 2 Out of 5 nodes achieved
Production Timelines: Intel Leads, TSMC Follows
Intel’s 18A is expected to enter mass production by mid-2025, giving it a head start in the race. In comparison, TSMC’s N2 node will likely enter high-volume manufacturing in late 2025, with product availability not expected until mid-2026. This timing difference could give Intel a competitive edge in the market, allowing it to address demand for cutting-edge chips earlier.
Key Differences in Technology
| Feature | Intel 18A | TSMC N2 |
|---|---|---|
| Transistor Density | 31.8 Mb/mm² (SRAM) | 38 Mb/mm² (SRAM) |
| Performance | 15% performance per watt improvement | 15% performance gain over previous node |
| Power Efficiency | Improved with PowerVia | 30% power efficiency improvement |
| Technology | RibbonFET and PowerVia | Nanosheet GAA transistors |
| Production Timeline | Mid-2025 | Late 2025 (high-volume), Mid-2026 (availability) |
Power Efficiency and Yield Concerns
One of TSMC’s advantages over Intel has been its history of delivering power-efficient chips. The N2 node is no different and is expected to continue this trend. Historically, TSMC has been known to produce chips with excellent power-to-performance ratios, and with its N2 node, TSMC seems poised to maintain its lead in this area.
Intel, with its 18A, is pushing the envelope with PowerVia to combat power losses. While this technology could significantly improve the chip’s overall performance, there are concerns regarding the initial yield rates for both companies’ 2nm-class nodes. As production begins, yields for both Intel’s 18A and TSMC’s N2 are expected to be relatively low, with estimates indicating yields might be around 20-30% during the early stages of manufacturing. These early yield rates will be crucial in determining how quickly both companies can scale production and meet market demand.
techovedas.com/explosive-rise-of-moores-law-process-technology-evolution
The Future of 3D ICs and Moore’s Law
Both Intel and TSMC are pushing the boundaries of Moore’s Law, which predicts the doubling of transistor density approximately every two years.
While both companies continue to shrink transistors, the real challenge lies in how effectively these technologies can be integrated into 3D ICs (three-dimensional integrated circuits). 3D IC technology allows for stacking multiple layers of chips, further enhancing performance and reducing power consumption.
This could be the next frontier as both companies strive to maintain their competitive edges in an increasingly demanding market.
Intel Foundry, Even if Successful, Will Be Overshadowed by TSMC: Chang
Conclusion
Intel’s 18A and TSMC’s N2 are setting the stage for the next era of semiconductor technology. Each has its strengths: Intel leads in performance and speed to market, while TSMC is focused on transistor density and power efficiency. As both companies enter mass production in the next few years, the battle between these two process nodes will undoubtedly have significant implications for the future of computing.
The coming years will reveal how these technologies evolve in real-world applications, and whether one will emerge as the definitive choice for high-performance chips in industries like mobile, AI, and high-performance computing.
Contact @Techovedas for guidance and expertise in Semiconductor domain
