TSMC Vs ASML: Comparing Q3 financials of 2 Semiconductor Giants

While ASML demonstrates higher valuation metrics and superior return on capital, TSMC boasts better profitability margins and a higher dividend yield.

Introduction:

Q3 Financial reports of semiconductor giants TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) Vs ASML Holdings provide investors and industry enthusiasts with valuable insights into the performance and prospects of these key players in the global semiconductor industry.

In this blog post, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the Q3 financials of TSMC and ASML, examining key financial metrics to gain a deeper understanding of their respective positions in the market.

Join Our WhatsApp News

TSMC Vs ASML

1. Valuation Metrics:

a. Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio:

  • ASML: 30.95
  • TSMC: 16.66
  • The P/E ratio indicates the market’s expectations for future earnings growth. A higher P/E ratio for ASML suggests that investors are willing to pay a premium for its earnings potential compared to TSMC.

b. Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio:

  • ASML: 19.81
  • TSMC: 4.69
  • A higher P/B ratio for ASML signifies a higher valuation relative to its book value compared to TSMC, indicating potentially higher investor confidence and expectations for future growth.

Read More: TSMC Continues to beat Intel & Samsung to Dominate Chip Revenue

2. Profitability Metrics:

a. Return on Equity (ROE):

  • ASML: 79.29%
  • TSMC: 30.39%
  • ASML demonstrates a significantly higher ROE, reflecting a more efficient utilization of shareholder equity to generate profits compared to TSMC.

b. Return on Assets (ROA):

  • ASML: 22.61%
  • TSMC: 18.23%
  • ASML’s higher ROA indicates a more effective use of assets to generate earnings, showcasing operational efficiency compared to TSMC.

c. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC):

  • ASML: 56.59%
  • TSMC: 23.39%
  • ASML’s higher ROIC suggests superior capital allocation and management efficiency, making it a more attractive investment in terms of returns on invested capital.

Read More: TSMC: 4 Trends Shaping Future of Chipmaking in the Next Decade

3. Profit Margins:

a. Gross Margin:

  • ASML: 51.87%
  • TSMC: 54.26%
  • TSMC boasts a slightly higher gross margin, indicating a better ability to control production costs and potentially offering a competitive advantage in manufacturing efficiency.

b. Net Margin:

  • ASML: 28.37%
  • TSMC: 38.59%
  • TSMC’s higher net margin implies better cost management at the operational level, resulting in a greater proportion of revenue translating into net income.

4. Financial Health:

a. Debt/Equity Ratio:

  • ASML: 0.38
  • TSMC: 0.28
  • Both companies maintain low debt/equity ratios, indicating a conservative approach to financing. TSMC’s slightly lower ratio suggests a relatively lower reliance on debt for capital.

b. Dividend Yield:

  • ASML: 0.86%
  • TSMC: 1.56%
  • TSMC offers a higher dividend yield, indicating a commitment to returning value to shareholders through dividends.

A table summarizing the key financial metrics for TSMC and ASML

MetricASMLTSMC
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio30.9516.66
P/B Ratio19.814.69
Profitability Metrics
ROE79.29%30.39%
ROA22.61%18.23%
ROIC56.59%23.39%
Profit Margins
Gross Margin51.87%54.26%
Net Margin28.37%38.59%
Financial Health
Debt/Equity Ratio0.380.28
Dividend Yield
Dividend Yield0.86%1.56%

This table provides a clear visual representation of the comparative financial metrics between ASML and TSMC, allowing for a quick and easy assessment of their respective strengths in various financial aspects.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Q3 financial comparison between TSMC and ASML reveals distinct strengths and areas of excellence for each company.

While ASML demonstrates higher valuation metrics and superior return on capital, TSMC boasts better profitability margins and a higher dividend yield.

Investors should carefully consider these financial indicators in the context of their investment goals and market outlook when making decisions regarding these semiconductor industry leaders.

Editorial Team
Editorial Team
Articles: 1800