White House AI Czar Claims DeepSeek Used OpenAI’s Model to Build Competing AI via ‘Distillation

David Sacks, the White House AI czar, claims that Chinese company DeepSeek used OpenAI’s AI models through distillation to develop a competing product.

Introduction

In a recent interview with Fox News, David Sacks, the newly appointed AI and crypto czar under former President Donald Trump, made a stunning claim. He stated that there is “substantial evidence” that DeepSeek, a Chinese-based AI company, employed a technique called “distillation” to develop a competing artificial intelligence model, using OpenAI’s technology as the foundation.

Sacks’ comments have raised questions about the boundaries of AI development, intellectual property rights, and the future of AI competition on the global stage.

The allegations come amid growing concerns about the role of foreign actors in shaping the next generation of AI technologies.

techovedas.com/asml-exceeds-expectations-with-e7-1-billion-in-net-bookings-and-e9-3-billion-in-q4-fy24/

Key Takeaways:

David Sacks’ Claim: DeepSeek allegedly used OpenAI’s models via distillation to create a competitor.

Distillation: The technique helps create smaller, more efficient models based on larger ones.

AI Arms Race: The U.S. and China are in a fierce competition for AI leadership.

Intellectual Property: If DeepSeek used OpenAI’s models, it would raise serious intellectual property concerns.

Future Regulations: The controversy could push for stricter AI regulations and better protection of proprietary technologies.

What is AI Distillation?

AI “distillation” is a process that allows one model to be trained on the outputs of another. It is a more efficient way to transfer knowledge from a large, powerful model to a smaller, more accessible one.

Distillation in AI helps make models smaller, faster, and more efficient while keeping most of the original performance.

This process has drawn attention as companies look to reduce the high costs of training large models.

Distillation allows AI firms to scale down expensive, resource-heavy models without sacrificing too much capability.

https://medium.com/@kumari.sushma661/from-samsung-to-xiaomi-top-5-foldable-smartphone-market-of-2025-unveiled-3345d94bd0b4

OpenAI’s Alleged Involvement

David Sacks claims that DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company, used OpenAI’s models through distillation to create a competitor.

This could have significant consequences for intellectual property rights. Sacks also suggests that OpenAI has proof to back this accusation, though the specifics remain unclear.

The AI Race Between the U.S. and China

AI is a battleground between the U.S. and China. Both countries want to lead in AI development, which has widespread implications for industries like healthcare and national security.

The U.S. has led the charge with firms like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft. Meanwhile, China has heavily invested in AI, particularly for military and economic purposes.

The DeepSeek situation highlights this ongoing geopolitical rivalry.

techovedas.com/rir-to-set-up-indias-first-sic-semiconductor-plant-in-odisha-with-₹618-60-crore-investment-creating-750-jobs/

DeepSeek’s Alleged Ties to China

DeepSeek is a lesser-known Chinese company, yet its rapid rise in AI has raised eyebrows. If DeepSeek did use OpenAI’s models, it would be a serious violation of intellectual property.

This case highlights concerns about Chinese firms using unfair practices to catch up with U.S. tech giants in AI development.

techovedas.com/deepseek-the-6m-chinese-ai-startup-that-erased-2-trillion-dollars-in-market-cap/

Legal and Ethical Issues

Using distillation without permission can cross ethical lines. It’s acceptable to be inspired by other models, but copying outputs from proprietary models is another matter.

If DeepSeek used OpenAI’s technology in this way, it would spark legal debates about AI model protection and fair use.

AI companies may need to rethink how they safeguard their models as this issue intensifies.

The Need for Stronger Regulations

The DeepSeek case calls for clearer regulations on AI intellectual property.

As AI continues to expand, protecting innovations will be crucial. Governments and companies may need to reassess how they protect their AI models from unauthorized use.

Conclusion

The DeepSeek controversy is just one example of the growing tension around AI competition and intellectual property.

If proven true, it could lead to stricter AI regulations and more careful protection of proprietary technologies.

OpenAI has yet to comment on the claims, but the situation may evolve as new evidence emerges.

Kumar Priyadarshi
Kumar Priyadarshi

Kumar Joined IISER Pune after qualifying IIT-JEE in 2012. In his 5th year, he travelled to Singapore for his master’s thesis which yielded a Research Paper in ACS Nano. Kumar Joined Global Foundries as a process Engineer in Singapore working at 40 nm Process node. Working as a scientist at IIT Bombay as Senior Scientist, Kumar Led the team which built India’s 1st Memory Chip with Semiconductor Lab (SCL).

Articles: 2623